Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF Sees Significant Inflow of $4.3 Billion
Insights into Recent Performance and Key Holdings
Examining changes in shares outstanding for ETFs recently, the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (Symbol: VTI) has distinguished itself with a substantial inflow of approximately $4.3 billion. This represents a 0.9% increase from last week, with outstanding units rising from 1,575,749,087 to 1,590,112,901. When looking at VTI’s major holdings today, Apple Inc (Symbol: AAPL) decreased by about 0.1%, Microsoft Corporation (Symbol: MSFT) increased by roughly 0.9%, and NVIDIA Corp (Symbol: NVDA) rose by about 1.6%. For an in-depth list of VTI’s holdings, check the VTI Holdings page.
The following chart illustrates the one-year price performance of VTI in relation to its 200-day moving average:
According to the chart, VTI reached a low of $243.35 per share over the past year, with a peak of $302.945. The most recent trading price stands at $300.30. Utilizing the 200-day moving average as a technical analysis tool can provide additional insights into the ETF’s performance—discover more about the 200-day moving average here.
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) operate similarly to stocks, but investors are actually engaging in the buying and selling of “units” rather than “shares.” These units can be actively traded just like stocks but also can be created or destroyed based on investor demand. Each week, we track changes in shares outstanding to identify ETFs with significant inflows (indicating new units created) or outflows (indicating old units destroyed). The creation of new units necessitates the purchase of the ETF’s underlying holdings, while unit destruction requires selling these underlying assets, making substantial flows impactful on the individual components within ETFs.
Click here to find out which 9 other ETFs had notable inflows »
Also see:
- Institutional Holders of AEO
- Institutional Holders of BBVA
- Autodesk market cap history
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nasdaq, Inc.
