Active Options Trading Highlights: RCL, DECK, and GM
Among the underlying components of the S&P 500 index, notable options trading volume was observed today for several companies.
Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) Options Volume
In Royal Caribbean Group (Symbol: RCL), a total of 14,130 contracts have changed hands, representing about 1.4 million underlying shares. This figure amounts to approximately 48.3% of RCL’s average daily trading volume of 2.9 million shares over the past month. High interest was noted in the $235 strike call option expiring on May 02, 2025, with 2,943 contracts traded, equivalent to around 294,300 underlying shares of RCL. Below is a chart illustrating RCL’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $235 strike highlighted in orange:
Deckers Outdoor Corp. (DECK) Options Activity
Deckers Outdoor Corp. (Symbol: DECK) saw options volume of 14,546 contracts today. This activity reflects approximately 1.5 million underlying shares, accounting for about 43.3% of DECK’s average daily trading volume of 3.4 million shares over the past month. The $113 strike call option expiring on May 16, 2025, stood out with 4,134 contracts traded, translating to around 413,400 underlying shares of DECK. Below is a chart showing DECK’s trailing twelve-month trading history, featuring the $113 strike in orange:
General Motors Co (GM) Options Trends
General Motors Co (Symbol: GM) also exhibited significant options trading with 59,259 contracts traded, equivalent to approximately 5.9 million underlying shares. This volume represents about 40.9% of GM’s average daily trading volume of 14.5 million shares over the past month. Particularly high activity was observed in the $50 strike call option, with 7,922 contracts traded today, representing around 792,200 underlying shares of GM. Below is a chart detailing GM’s trailing twelve-month trading history, highlighting the $50 strike:
For additional information on RCL, DECK, or GM options expirations, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
