Stryker Corp Sees Mixed Activity in Recent Hedge Fund Filings
Recent analysis of the 13F filings for the reporting period ending March 31, 2025, revealed that Stryker Corp (Symbol: SYK) was held by 13 hedge funds. When multiple managers exhibit similar positions, it may warrant deeper investigation.
It is essential to note that these filings only provide a partial view. Hedge funds are required to disclose their long positions with the SEC but not their short positions. For instance, a fund might go long on some shares while simultaneously shorting the stock, which could lead to misleading interpretations of their overall stance.
Despite this limitation, analyzing groups of 13F filings can offer valuable insights. Below, we explore shifts in SYK positions based on our latest data:
During this reporting period, two funds increased their SYK positions from December 31, 2024, while four funds reduced theirs, and one initiated a new position.
Expanding our review beyond this specific group, we aggregated the share count of all funds holding SYK as of March 31, 2025, from a total of 2,392 funds analyzed. We compared this with the total shares held as of December 31, 2024, to gauge the trend. Between these two dates, funds collectively increased their holdings by 275,052 shares, raising the total from 14,793,471 to 15,068,523—an approximate increase of 1.86%. The top three funds holding SYK on March 31, 2025, included:
We will continue monitoring recent 13F filings and share insights from the aggregate data across various managers. While individual filings may be misleading due to their long-only nature, analyzing total holdings across groups from one reporting period to another can reveal more pertinent information and provide potential investment ideas, such as those related to Stryker Corp (Symbol: SYK).
10 S&P 500 Components Hedge Funds Are Buying »
Additional Insights:
• MFS Price Target
• BGZ Historical Stock Prices
• STKL shares outstanding history
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
