SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF Sees $170 Million Inflow This Week
In a recent analysis of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracked by ETF Channel, the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (Symbol: SPYG) has experienced notable activity. This week, it recorded an inflow of approximately $170 million, reflecting a 0.6% increase in outstanding units—from 377,850,108 to 379,950,108.
Performance of Key Holdings
Among the top components of SPYG, today’s trading reveals varied performance: Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Symbol: BRK.B) increased by about 0.2%, while Progressive Corp. (Symbol: PGR) declined around 2%. Additionally, KLA Corp (Symbol: KLAC) saw a decrease of about 0.6%. For a comprehensive overview of SPYG’s holdings, visit the SPYG Holdings page.
Price Performance Analysis
The chart below illustrates the one-year price performance of SPYG in relation to its 200-day moving average:
Currently, SPYG’s lowest price over the past 52 weeks is $68.48 per share, while the highest point reached $92.76. The latest trade price stands at $80.76. Evaluating the recent share price against the 200-day moving average can serve as a valuable technical analysis strategy—discover more about this method here.
Understanding ETF Trading
ETFs function similarly to stocks; however, investors are actually trading “units” rather than shares. These “units” can be bought and sold just like stock shares, but they can also be created or destroyed to meet investor demand. Each week, we examine changes in outstanding unit counts to identify ETFs that face significant inflows (new units created) or outflows (old units dissolved). A surge in new units indicates that the ETF’s underlying assets must be acquired, while a decrease suggests that these assets are being sold. Significant movements can influence the performance of the ETFs’ components.
Click here for information on nine other ETFs that have seen notable inflows »
Related Insights:
- Institutional Holders of NVCT
- XLF Options Chain
- Institutional Holders of RCD
The views and opinions expressed herein belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.








