In afternoon trading on Friday, Energy stocks are the best performing sector, up 1.0%. Within the sector, Valero Energy Corp (Symbol: VLO) and Marathon Petroleum Corp. (Symbol: MPC) are two large stocks leading the way, showing a gain of 3.5% and 2.8%, respectively. Among energy ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLE), which is up 1.1% on the day, and up 13.80% year-to-date. Valero Energy Corp, meanwhile, is up 27.04% year-to-date, and Marathon Petroleum Corp. is up 22.23% year-to-date. Combined, VLO and MPC make up approximately 7.3% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
The next best performing sector is the Materials sector, higher by 0.4%. Among large Materials stocks, Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold (Symbol: FCX) and DuPont (Symbol: DD) are the most notable, showing a gain of 3.6% and 2.7%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB), which is up 0.6% in midday trading, and up 7.86% on a year-to-date basis. Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold, meanwhile, is up 27.34% year-to-date, and DuPont is up 4.06% year-to-date. Combined, FCX and DD make up approximately 10.6% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here’s a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Friday. As you can see, three sectors are up on the day, while six sectors are down.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Energy | +1.0% |
Materials | +0.4% |
Financial | +0.3% |
Services | -0.1% |
Utilities | -0.1% |
Healthcare | -0.1% |
Industrial | -0.1% |
Consumer Products | -0.4% |
Technology & Communications | -0.4% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
Carl Icahn Stock Picks
Institutional Holders of McDonalds
Nordson MACD
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.