The economy, like a bustling metropolis, with its labyrinthine twists and turns, often eludes the grasp of the everyday citizen. Much like a grand symphony, the sway a president holds over the economy is not as commanding as commonly perceived. Indeed, the Federal Reserve wields a more direct influence that resonates through the economic landscape.
Delve Deeper: What Is the Net Worth of President Joe Biden As He Navigates Re-Election?
Read More: Peek into the Wealth of Every Living US President: Where Does Biden Stand?
Nevertheless, the performance of the economy remains a barometer that guides voters’ choices. A thriving economy typically bolsters the chances of an incumbent president for re-election, while a recession can cast a shadow over their prospects.
Fair is fair; presidents do hold some levers to shape the economic trajectory. Their trade policies can send ripples across markets. In times of crises, a president can catalyze relief efforts that mitigate potential long-term economic fallout.
Yet, the economy is a complex tapestry. Peering into the numbers — frozen snapshots at the culmination of their terms — reveals a nuanced tale. Most presidents have left their mark on the economy, for better or for worse. This complexity underscores the chasm between rhetoric and economic reality.
The LBJ Era: Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)
- GDP growth: 2.6%
- Unemployment rate: 3.4%
- Inflation rate: 4.4%
- Poverty rate: 12.80%
- Real disposable income per capita: $17,181
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $130,520
Lyndon B. Johnson’s tenure boasted commendable achievements such as the Clean Air Act and the Civil Rights Act. While GDP growth was modest, he commanded the highest inflation-adjusted income on our roster and the lowest unemployment rate. He straddles the middle ground for inflation and poverty rates.
Explore Further: Peeking into the Financial Empire of Former President Donald Trump
Learn More: What’s the Wealth Account of Kevin McCarthy?
The Nixon Conundrum: Richard Nixon (1969-1974)
- GDP growth: 2.0%
- Unemployment rate: 5.5%
- Inflation rate: 10.9%
- Poverty rate: 12.00%
- Real disposable income per capita: $19,621
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $110,961
Richard Nixon’s presidency spanned a full term marred by the Watergate scandal that culminated in his resignation — a first and sole instance for any president. While his era witnessed the second-highest inflation rate present here, it also boasted the second-highest inflation-adjusted income per capita. His GDP growth ranked fifth lowest, yet he lingered mid-way for unemployment rates.
Spotlight: 25 Wealthiest US Politicians
The Ford Interlude: Gerald Ford (1974-1977)
- GDP growth: 2.8%
- Unemployment rate: 7.5%
- Inflation rate: 5.2%
- Poverty rate: 11.90%
- Real disposable income per capita: $20,780
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $95,602
Ford’s brief 895-day presidency witnessed the second-highest unemployment rate, surpassed only by George W. Bush during the Great Recession. However, it achieved the third-highest GDP growth with poverty rates treading on the lower end. Inflation rates during his term ranked third.
The Carter Quirk: Jimmy Carter (1977-1981)
- GDP growth: 4.6%
- Unemployment rate: 7.4%
- Inflation rate: 11.8%
- Poverty rate: 13.00%
- Real disposable income per capita: $21,891
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $67,143
Jimmy Carter’s four-year tenure from 1977 to 1981 unfolds a tale of paradoxes. With the loftiest GDP growth, surpassing even President Joe Biden to date, Carter also bore the highest inflation rate and the third-highest unemployment rate. His stance on poverty rates nestled mid-pack.
The Reagan Riddle: Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)
- GDP growth: 2.1%
- Unemployment rate: 5.4%
- Inflation rate: 4.7%
- Poverty rate: 13.10%
- Real disposable income per capita: $27,080
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $60,887
Reagan’s reign predominantly flaunted numbers that tiptoed the median line. While his unemployment rate stands fifth-lowest, a notable 2% shy of Johnson’s benchmark. Positioned as the fifth highest for inflation, Reagan’s 4.7% inflation rate remains less than half of Carter’s era. However, a striking 13.10% poverty rate looms, just marginally below George H.W. Bush, who crowned our list with the highest poverty rate score.
Uncover More: The Extent of Senator Lindsey Graham’s Social Security Earnings
Insights Into U.S. Presidential Economic Performance
George H. W. Bush (1989-1993)
- GDP growth: 0.7%
- Unemployment rate: 7.3%
- Inflation rate: 3.3%
- Poverty rate: 14.50%
- Real disposable income per capita: $27,990
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $54,005
George H. W. Bush’s economic track record is as somber as a rainy day in November. With lackluster GDP growth and a high unemployment rate reminiscent of a marathon with no finish line, his time in office left much to be desired. Blessed only by a glimmer of hope in the form of a relatively low inflation rate, Bush’s economic legacy was unfortunately marred by the shadows of poverty.
Bill Clinton (1993-2001)
- GDP growth: 0.3%
- Unemployment rate: 4.2%
- Inflation rate: 3.7%
- Poverty rate: 11.30%
- Real disposable income per capita: $34,216
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $53,895
Bill Clinton’s economic tenure echoed echoes of his predecessor, with marginal GDP growth and controlled inflation rates. Yet, a stark contrast emerged in the battle against poverty, where Clinton’s administration stood as a beacon of hope against the backdrop of economic struggle faced previously.
George W. Bush (2001-2009)
- GDP growth: -1.2%
- Unemployment rate: 7.8%
- Inflation rate: 0.0%
- Poverty rate: 13.20%
- Real disposable income per capita: $37,814
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $49,141
George W. Bush’s presidential term coinciding with the Great Recession was akin to steering a ship through a perfect storm. With negative GDP growth and soaring unemployment rates, Bush’s economic landscape seemed dim at best. Despite this, the silver lining lay in the still waters of inflation, with Bush emerging as the sole guardian against rising price tides.
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
- GDP growth: 1.0%
- Unemployment rate: 4.7%
- Inflation rate: 2.5%
- Poverty rate: 14.00%
- Real disposable income per capita: $42,914
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $48,811
Barack Obama took the economic helm in the aftermath of a tempest, navigating tides of crisis and instability. While GDP growth saw an upturn from his predecessor, Obama faced mounting challenges in poverty alleviation and economic recovery. Yet, amidst the storm, his administration stood as a stalwart guardian of employment and inflation rates during turbulent times.
Donald Trump (2017-2021)
- GDP growth: 2.6%
- Unemployment rate: 6.4%
- Inflation rate: 1.4%
- Poverty rate: 11.90%
- Real disposable income per capita: $48,286
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $48,286
Donald Trump’s economic chapter painted a picture of fluctuating fortunes, with buoyant GDP growth and restrained inflation rates on one hand, while facing a swell in unemployment rates on the other. Despite the economic ebb and flow, his administration held strong against the tide of poverty, securing a foothold against economic uncertainties.
Joe Biden (2021-Present)
- GDP growth: 2.6%
- Unemployment rate: 3.5%
- Inflation rate: 5.0%
- Poverty rate: 12.80%
- Real disposable income per capita: $46,682
- Disposable income per capita (adjusted for inflation): $46,557
As Joe Biden steers the ship of state through uncharted waters, glimpses of prosperity and challenge illuminate his path. With a commendable record of low unemployment rates and robust GDP growth, Biden’s presidency reflects a nuanced tale of economic adaptation. Navigating through inflationary currents, his administration stands resilient in the face of changing economic tides.
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: From LBJ to Biden: How the Economy Performed Under Each President
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
