High Options Trading Volumes Observed for Hasbro, Macy’s, and Agilysys
Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, significant options trading activity was noted today for Hasbro, Inc. (Symbol: HAS). A total of 21,075 contracts have changed hands, which translates to approximately 2.1 million underlying shares. This figure represents about 81.8% of HAS’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which stands at 2.6 million shares. Particularly noteworthy was the volume for the $57.50 strike call option, set to expire on June 20, 2025, with 8,680 contracts traded, amounting to roughly 868,000 underlying shares. Below is a chart illustrating HAS’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $57.50 strike option highlighted in orange:
Macy’s Inc (Symbol: M) also experienced substantial options trading activity, with 41,198 contracts exchanged, representing about 4.1 million underlying shares. This figure accounts for approximately 71.1% of M’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 5.8 million shares. The $13.50 strike call option expiring on May 23, 2025, drew particular attention, with 12,930 contracts traded today, corresponding to around 1.3 million underlying shares. Below is a chart reflecting M’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $13.50 strike highlighted:
In addition, Agilysys Inc (Symbol: AGYS) reported options trading volume of 1,418 contracts, equating to approximately 141,800 underlying shares. This volume represents roughly 66.7% of AGYS’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which is 212,700 shares. Of particular note, the $90 strike call option expiring on June 20, 2025, had 276 contracts traded today, representing about 27,600 underlying shares. Below is a chart depicting AGYS’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $90 strike highlighted:
For details on the various expirations for HAS, M, or AGYS options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
