Significant Options Activity in Snowflake, Ouster, and Harrow
Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, notable options trading volume has emerged today. Snowflake Inc (Symbol: SNOW) leads with a total of 27,390 contracts traded, indicating approximately 2.7 million underlying shares. This figure represents about 80.4% of SNOW’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which stands at 3.4 million shares.
A particularly high volume was observed for the $175 strike call option expiring on May 09, 2025, where 3,780 contracts have traded today, equivalent to around 378,000 underlying shares. Below is a chart illustrating SNOW’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $175 strike highlighted in orange:
Ouster Inc (Symbol: OUST) also saw significant options volume, with 7,503 contracts traded so far, which amounts to approximately 750,300 underlying shares. This number constitutes about 79.8% of OUST’s average daily trading volume of 940,315 shares over the last month.
High activity was recorded for the $9 strike call option expiring May 16, 2025, with 774 contracts traded today, representing approximately 77,400 underlying shares. Below is a chart depicting OUST’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $9 strike highlighted:
Harrow Inc (Symbol: HROW) also made its mark with options trading volume reaching 2,971 contracts. This translates to around 297,100 underlying shares, or approximately 79.5% of HROW’s average daily trading volume of 373,925 shares over the past month.
The $70 strike call option expiring January 16, 2026, has particularly high volume as well, with 798 contracts traded today, equating to about 79,800 underlying shares. Below is a chart showing HROW’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $70 strike highlighted:
For further information on the various available expirations for SNOW, OUST, and HROW options, please refer to StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
The views and opinions expressed herein are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
