Among the underlying components of the S&P 500 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Palo Alto Networks, Inc (Symbol: PANW), where a total of 19,084 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 1.9 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 52.2% of PANW’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 3.7 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $290 strike call option expiring April 26, 2024, with 1,880 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 188,000 underlying shares of PANW. Below is a chart showing PANW’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $290 strike highlighted in orange:
Enphase Energy Inc. (Symbol: ENPH) saw options trading volume of 17,173 contracts, representing approximately 1.7 million underlying shares or approximately 50.8% of ENPH’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 3.4 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $93 strike put option expiring April 26, 2024, with 4,610 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 461,000 underlying shares of ENPH. Below is a chart showing ENPH’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $93 strike highlighted in orange:
And General Motors Co (Symbol: GM) saw options trading volume of 57,323 contracts, representing approximately 5.7 million underlying shares or approximately 42.5% of GM’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 13.5 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $50 strike call option expiring June 21, 2024, with 5,737 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 573,700 underlying shares of GM. Below is a chart showing GM’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $50 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for PANW options, ENPH options, or GM options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
BBCN Options Chain
FFC Average Annual Return
Funds Holding CNO
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
