Increased Options Trading Volume for Boeing, NVIDIA, and Cadence Design

Today, the Russell 3000 index saw significant options trading activity in several companies, particularly Boeing Co. (Symbol: BA). A total of 48,758 contracts have traded, equating to about 4.9 million underlying shares. This represents approximately 43.7% of BA’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which stands at 11.1 million shares. Notably, the $185 strike call option expiring on May 02, 2025, generated high interest with 3,500 contracts traded, reflecting about 350,000 underlying shares of BA. The chart below shows BA’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $185 strike highlighted in orange:

NVIDIA Corp (Symbol: NVDA) reported an impressive options volume of 1.4 million contracts so far today. This volume corresponds to approximately 144.8 million underlying shares, making up 43.2% of NVDA’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which is 335.2 million shares. The $110 strike call option expiring on May 02, 2025, has experienced particularly high activity, with 83,705 contracts traded, translating to about 8.4 million underlying shares of NVDA. Below is the chart illustrating NVDA’s trading history, with the $110 strike in orange:

Cadence Design Systems Inc (Symbol: CDNS) also noted a strong options trading volume of 10,165 contracts, which corresponds to approximately 1.0 million underlying shares. This figure represents around 42.3% of CDNS’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which is 2.4 million shares. The $320 strike call option expiring on May 16, 2025, recorded a notable volume of 2,023 contracts traded, representing around 202,300 underlying shares of CDNS. The chart below depicts CDNS’s trading history, with the $320 strike indicated in orange:

For more options expiration details for BA, NVDA, and CDNS, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.

Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »

Also see:

• RDHL Options Chain
• VFF Videos
• Funds Holding UPXI

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.