Significant Options Trading Activity in Intapp, United Airlines, and Microsoft
Today’s trading data reveals high options volume within the Russell 3000 index, particularly highlighting Intapp Inc (Symbol: INTA). Thus far, traders have engaged in 3,102 contracts, representing around 310,200 underlying shares. This volume equates to approximately 55% of INTA’s average daily trading volume of 564,405 shares over the past month. A significant portion of today’s activity includes the $60 strike call option set to expire on May 16, 2025, with 2,000 contracts traded, corresponding to roughly 200,000 underlying shares. Below is a chart illustrating INTA’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $60 strike highlighted in orange:
United Airlines Holdings Inc (Symbol: UAL) is also experiencing robust options activity today, with a total of 60,336 contracts traded. This represents approximately 6.0 million underlying shares, amounting to a notable 53.5% of UAL’s average daily trading volume of 11.3 million shares over the same period. Particularly active are the $80 strike call options expiring May 16, 2025, with 2,830 contracts traded, indicating around 283,000 shares involved. Below is a trading history chart for UAL, with the $80 strike highlighted in orange:
Meanwhile, Microsoft Corporation (Symbol: MSFT) shows impressive options trading volume of 138,542 contracts, representing approximately 13.9 million underlying shares. This accounts for about 50.1% of MSFT’s average daily trading volume of 27.7 million shares over the past month. Notably, the $400 strike call option expiring April 17, 2025, has seen substantial action today, with 6,890 contracts traded, reflecting roughly 689,000 underlying shares. The chart below represents MSFT’s trailing twelve-month trading history, featuring the $400 strike in orange:
For a range of expiration options on INTA, UAL, or MSFT, please visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
- GNTY Options Chain
- Funds Holding TOUS
- PVA Split History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
