Midday Market Update: Consumer Products and Energy Sectors Lead
As of Tuesday afternoon, the Consumer Products sector is leading the market with a 0.2% increase. Notably, Tesla Inc (Symbol: TSLA) and Tapestry Inc (Symbol: TPR) have emerged as standout performers with gains of 5.8% and 3.3%, respectively. In terms of sector performance, the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (Symbol: IYK) is down 0.3% today but has increased by 9.25% year-to-date. In contrast, Tesla Inc has seen a decline of 32.09% year-to-date, while Tapestry Inc has appreciated by 11.92% during the same period.
The Energy sector follows closely behind, up 0.1%. Among major Energy stocks, Baker Hughes Company (Symbol: BKR) and Schlumberger Ltd (Symbol: SLB) lead with gains of 1.0% and 0.9%, respectively. The Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE), which tracks these stocks, is flat today but is up 9.91% year-to-date. For the year, Baker Hughes Company has gained 8.78%, and Schlumberger Ltd has increased by 10.75%. Together, BKR and SLB comprise approximately 6.7% of XLE’s underlying holdings.
For a deeper analysis, the trailing twelve-month price performance of these stocks and ETFs can be visualized in the relative Stock price performance chart below, where each symbol is color-coded as per the legend provided.
Stock Channel” border=”0″ src=”https://secure.tickertech.com/pics/2025/16403823341.gif”>
Additionally, here is an overview of the S&P 500 components within various sectors as they perform in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As shown, two sectors are positive while six are experiencing declines.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Consumer Products | +0.2% |
Energy | +0.1% |
Utilities | -0.0% |
Services | -0.1% |
Industrial | -0.1% |
Materials | -0.1% |
Technology & Communications | -0.2% |
Financial | -0.5% |
Healthcare | -1.0% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
also see:
• Preferred Stock Premium Newsletter
• OCGN Insider Buying
• Institutional Holders of VCF
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.