In afternoon trading on Tuesday, Healthcare stocks are the worst performing sector, showing a 1.5% loss. Within that group, Moderna Inc (Symbol: MRNA) and Cooper Companies, Inc. (Symbol: COO) are two of the day’s laggards, showing a loss of 9.5% and 3.0%, respectively. Among healthcare ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLV), which is down 1.5% on the day, and up 4.69% year-to-date. Moderna Inc, meanwhile, is up 51.58% year-to-date, and Cooper Companies, Inc., is down 2.68% year-to-date. Combined, MRNA and COO make up approximately 1.3% of the underlying holdings of XLV.
The next worst performing sector is the Consumer Products sector, showing a 1.2% loss. Among large Consumer Products stocks, Tyson Foods Inc (Symbol: TSN) and Ford Motor Co. (Symbol: F) are the most notable, showing a loss of 3.2% and 3.2%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Consumer Products stocks is the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK), which is down 1.6% in midday trading, and up 3.24% on a year-to-date basis. Tyson Foods Inc, meanwhile, is up 8.45% year-to-date, and Ford Motor Co. is up 0.45% year-to-date. TSN makes up approximately 0.8% of the underlying holdings of IYK.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here’s a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As you can see, one sector is up on the day, while eight sectors are down.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Energy | +0.7% |
Utilities | -0.1% |
Technology & Communications | -0.2% |
Materials | -0.3% |
Services | -0.5% |
Financial | -0.9% |
Consumer Products | -1.2% |
Industrial | -1.2% |
Healthcare | -1.5% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
Institutional Holders of AFOP
SLNO Historical Stock Prices
GSF Videos
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.