Consumer Products Sector Struggles As Stocks Dip in Afternoon Trading
On Tuesday afternoon, the Consumer Products sector struggled, experiencing a 0.5% decline. Notable among the laggards were Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Symbol: CL) and Tesla Inc. (Symbol: TSLA), which fell by 2.5% and 2.2%, respectively. For those tracking the sector through ETFs, the iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (Symbol: IYK) also dropped by 0.6% today, but remains up 11.85% year-to-date. In contrast, Colgate-Palmolive Co. has enjoyed a robust year with a 21.31% increase and Tesla Inc. has soared by 40.59% year-to-date. Colgate-Palmolive makes up roughly 3.0% of IYK’s holdings.
The Industrial sector followed closely behind, also down by 0.5%. Among major Industrial stocks, FedEx Corp (Symbol: FDX) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd (Symbol: NCLH) reported larger losses of 4.0% and 3.2%, respectively. The Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI), which mirrors Industrial stock performance, saw a decrease of 0.7% in midday trading, but it still boasts a 25.62% gain year-to-date. Year-to-date, FedEx Corp has risen by 14.13%, while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd has climbed by 36.95%. FedEx makes up about 1.3% of XLI’s underlying assets.
For a broader perspective on performance, below is a chart comparing the stock prices of these companies and ETFs over the trailing twelve months, color-coded for clarity:

This snapshot reflects how different sectors within the S&P 500 are performing during the afternoon trading session on Tuesday, highlighting a mixed bag with two sectors up while seven remain down.
| Sector | % Change |
|---|---|
| Energy | +0.3% |
| Utilities | +0.1% |
| Services | -0.2% |
| Healthcare | -0.3% |
| Financial | -0.3% |
| Technology & Communications | -0.3% |
| Materials | -0.3% |
| Consumer Products | -0.5% |
| Industrial | -0.5% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
• QDIV Options Chain
• BBG Videos
• TRNO Insider Buying
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.








