Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF: A Stable Choice for Investors

The Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL), which launched on December 1, 2006, aims to provide extensive coverage of the Large Cap Blend segment of the U.S. stock market.

Sponsored by Invesco, the ETF has built up over $925.08 million in assets, positioning it as one of the larger funds within this investment category.

The Appeal of Large Cap Blend Investing

Large cap companies, those with market capitalizations exceeding $10 billion, are often regarded as more stable investments. These companies generally showcase steady cash flows and lower volatility compared to mid and small-cap firms.

Blend ETFs typically include a mix of both growth and value stocks, combining traits of these investment styles for balanced exposure.

Understanding Costs

Keeping an eye on an ETF’s expense ratio is crucial, as lower-cost funds usually yield better returns, all else being equal.

EQWL’s annual operating expenses stand at 0.25%, aligning with similar funds in the market.

Moreover, it boasts a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.77%.

Analyzing Sector Exposure and Major Holdings

Before investing, it’s essential to investigate an ETF’s holdings. While diversified exposure minimizes the risk associated with individual stocks, transparency is a critical feature of most ETFs, which typically disclose their holdings daily.

This ETF has its largest allocation in the Financials sector, comprising around 20% of its portfolio. Information Technology and Industrials follow as the second and third largest sectors.

Examining its top individual holdings, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) accounts for approximately 1.12% of total assets, along with Intel Corp (INTC) and Meta Platforms Inc (META). Collectively, the top 10 holdings represent about 11% of total assets under management.

Performance Insights and Risk Factors

EQWL aims to replicate the performance of the Russell Top 200 Equal Weight Index, adjusting for fees and expenses. This index provides equal-weighted exposure to the largest 200 companies in the U.S. equity market.

So far this year, the ETF has surged by approximately 22.79% and has increased about 35.85% over the past year (as of November 14, 2024). Over the last 52 weeks, the price has ranged from $81.60 to $106.69.

With a beta of 0.97 and a standard deviation of 15.57% over the trailing three years, EQWL is classified as a medium-risk investment. Its 102 holdings contribute to effective diversification of company-specific risks.

Exploring Alternatives

The Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is determined by anticipated asset class returns, expense ratios, and recent performance trends. Therefore, EQWL is a solid choice for those seeking exposure to the Large Cap Blend sector.

Investors might also consider other ETFs like the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), both tracking similar indices. While IVV manages $567.47 billion in assets, SPY holds $632.47 billion. The expense ratios are notably low at 0.03% for IVV and 0.09% for SPY.

Final Thoughts

ETFs that follow a passive management style are gaining traction among both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency. They are particularly appealing for long-term investment strategies.

To discover more about this ETF and others, consider checking product listings that align with your investment goals and explore articles that cover the latest developments in the ETF investment landscape.

Stay Updated with ETF Information

Subscribe to Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter for weekly updates on top news and analysis, along with insights on top-performing ETFs.

Looking for the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Download “5 Stocks Set to Double” for free today.

Find research reports on Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL), Intel Corporation (INTC), Caterpillar Inc. (CAT), SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

To access this article on Zacks.com, click here.

Zacks Investment Research

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.