Are you in pursuit of the Utilities sector exposure? Fear not, for there are various funds that cover this sector. In this piece, we will dissect and compare 6 of these funds.
Exploring the Fund
The Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSE:UTG) identifies as a closed-end fund, or CEF for short.
UTG’s goal is to provide a substantial after-tax total return primarily through tax-privileged dividend income and capital appreciation. The fund intends to invest at least 80% of its total assets in dividend-paying common and preferred stocks, as well as debt instruments of companies within the utility industry. The remaining 20% of its assets may be invested in other securities including stocks, money market instruments and debt instruments, as well as certain derivative instruments in the utility industry or other industries. (UTG site)
As of 12/32/23, UTG had $2.08B in Net Assets, with 65 holdings, up from 44 at 9/30/23. Its expense ratio stands at 2.44%, which includes 1.10% in Interest expense, due to the 31% leverage that management uses.
Picture goes here.
The comparison below pits UTG against various funds with high exposure to Utilities, we have:
-BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI)-Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund (DPG)-Gabelli Global Utility & Income Trust (GLU)-Macquarie/First Trust Global Infrastructure/Utilities Dividend & Income Fund (MFD)-Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (UTF).
As of 12/31/23, UTG had 56.7% exposure to Utilities, way down vs. 77% at 9/30/23. DPG has the highest Utilities exposure, at 89.3%, while GLU has the lowest, at 30.4%.
UTG is the only fund in this group with a positive 5-year dividend growth, at 2.46%. MFD and DPG actually have negative 5-year growth rates of -.7.79% and -4.36%, respectively.
UTG and UTF have the largest 3-month average daily volume by far, at 299K and 286K, respectively, while GLU is at the low end of the scale, with 17.5K average daily volume.
MFD has by far the highest relative volume at 2X, followed by UTF, at 1.04X, whereas the rest of the group has lower than average relative volume, with GLU having the lowest, at just .33X.
UTG and UTF have the largest market caps of all these funds, at $1.96B and $2B, respectively, with MFD being the smallest, at ~$64M.
MFD has the highest dividend yield of the group, at 10.7%, while BUI’s 6.5% yield is the lowest.
Another picture goes here.
The Gift of Dividends
UTG has poured out over $1.3B to investors since its establishment in 2004.
Another image appears.
The management announces each quarter’s monthly amounts, ex-dividend dates, and pay dates in advance. Management has held the monthly payout steady at $.19 since July 2021, following an increment from $.18.
Time of 1/26/24, UTG offers a yield of 8.66% at its closing price of $26.32. It goes ex-dividend next on 2/15/24, with a pay date of 2/29/24.
One more image pops up.
The Dreaded Taxes
From 2015 onwards, UTG’s distributions started to become centered around long-term capital gains.
Another image resurfaces.
During November ’23 – January ’24, UTG’s distributions were composed of ~78% long-term capital gain and 22% NII:
One last image to tackle.
The Supportive Holdings
As of 12/31/23, UTG’s 2nd largest industry exposure was 20%, in Communication Services – it holds prominent cap telecoms, such as Germany’s Deutsche Telekom, and Canada’s BCE.
The final image appears.
Unveiling the Performance of Hidden Dividend Stocks Plus Fund
Its top 10 includes NiSource, (NI), a US Gas utility, its largest single Utility holding, at 4.59%, with 4%-plus amounts held in other utilities Entergy, …
Valuations Unveiled
CEFs’ daily valuations are calculated at the end of each trading day. Is buying CEF’s at deeper than historic discounts to NAV a useful strategy due …
At $26.05, UTG was trading at a slight 0.19% premium to its 1/25/24 NAV per share of $26.00. What about its 1-, 3-, and 5-year price to NAV’s? Let’s delve …
What’s the deal with DPG and its -13.59% deviation from its long term prices to NAV of -3.6% to 1.46%? Is this an outlier or a significant trend? …
MFD’s -14.42% price to NAV is also much deeper than its 3- and 5-year averages, as is GLU’s -8.58% price to NAV. What does this reveal about their …
Unmasking Performance Trends
Is BUI’s positive total return over the past year, at 3.13%, an outlier or indicative of broader trends in the market? Let’s put this figure into context.
With the pivot in interest rate forecasts, all of the Utilities-based funds had impressive gains over the past quarter. Can these gains be attributed to specific factors?
Is UTG’s annual total return from inception of 8.95% on a price basis, and 9.20% on an NAV basis, indicative of long-term success? How do these figures compare to peers?
Parting Suggestions
Given its long-term performance and attractive yield, is UTG a good income vehicle for income investors seeking exposure to the Utilities sector? What should potential investors consider before making a move?