Highlights from Today’s Options Trading in Autodesk, Crane, and Duke Energy
Autodesk Inc (ADSK) Sees Significant Options Activity
In today’s trading, Autodesk Inc (Symbol: ADSK) had considerable options trading volume, with 5,685 contracts exchanged. This represents around 568,500 underlying shares, equating to about 45.9% of ADSK’s average daily trading volume of 1.2 million shares over the past month. Notably, the $325 strike call option, set to expire on February 07, 2025, saw particularly high activity, with 1,026 contracts traded, which translates to around 102,600 underlying shares. The accompanying chart displays ADSK’s trading history over the last twelve months, highlighting the $325 strike in orange:
Crane Co (CR) Experiences Robust Options Trading
Crane Co (Symbol: CR) also marked an active trading day, recording a total of 1,097 contracts, which amounts to around 109,700 underlying shares, or approximately 45.7% of CR’s average daily trading volume of 240,300 shares over the past month. High volume was noted for the $155 strike put option due to expire on February 21, 2025, with 205 contracts traded, equating to about 20,500 underlying shares. Below is CR’s trading history over the last year, with the $155 strike highlighted in orange:
Duke Energy Corp (DUK) Shows Strong Options Volume
Duke Energy Corp (Symbol: DUK) reported a whopping volume of 13,370 contracts today, representing around 1.3 million underlying shares. This figure corresponds to 44.5% of DUK’s average daily trading volume of 3.0 million shares from the past month. The $115 strike call option, expiring on April 17, 2025, is particularly noteworthy, with 5,193 contracts traded, or about 519,300 underlying shares. The chart below illustrates DUK’s trading trends over the past twelve months, with the $115 strike marked in orange:
For information on various expiring options for ADSK, CR, or DUK, check out StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
- JJN Videos
- BUD Stock Predictions
- CHCO Split History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.