President Biden has laid out his vision for the nation in his recent State of the Union address, and now it’s time to see if Americans will rally behind his proposed changes.
In his $7.3 trillion budget proposal for fiscal year 2025, Biden has allocated substantial funds for Social Security. The big question remains – will the American public support his ambitious agenda?
Image source: Official White House photo by Adam Schultz.
Influx of Funds for Social Security in fiscal 2025
Biden aims to boost the discretionary budget for the Social Security Administration (SSA) by $1.3 billion from its 2023 level. This move would take the agency’s total budget to $15.4 billion, solely focusing on administrative functions.
It’s worth noting that these funds are separate from the benefits payments, which topped $1.3 trillion last year. The majority of benefit funding comes from payroll taxes. Biden’s budget proposal seeks to enhance service quality for Social Security recipients by injecting more resources into the agency.
Biden’s Grand Designs for Social Security
Biden’s vision for overhauling Social Security goes beyond mere administrative enhancements. The President also wants to collaborate with Congress to fortify the federal program, guided by principles he outlined in his proposed budget.
Among his key principles is a staunch opposition to any cuts in Social Security benefits. Biden considers an extension of the full retirement age as a benefit reduction. Moreover, he explicitly rejects any proposals to privatize the Social Security system.
Another pillar of Biden’s plan involves ensuring the solvency of Social Security by making the highest-income individuals pay their fair share. While the budget lacked specifics on this front, Biden has previously suggested subjecting all income above $400,000 to the payroll tax that supports Social Security.
Additionally, the President is keen to collaborate with Congress on enhancing financial security for seniors and individuals with disabilities, although details on this aspect were scant in his budget proposal.
Promising Public Reception
Public sentiment toward Biden’s proposed changes to Social Security appears favorable. According to a survey by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation (PPC), an overwhelming 80% of respondents supported making all earnings above $400,000 subject to the payroll tax. This proposal garnered bipartisan backing, with 77% of Republicans and 86% of Democrats endorsing it.
While a significant portion of respondents expressed willingness to raise the Social Security payroll tax rate, aligning with Biden’s stance, views diverged on increasing the full retirement age. However, a slight majority (53%) favored this proposal.
Although Biden’s budget lacked specifics on enhancing financial security for seniors and individuals with disabilities, the PPC survey indicated strong support for raising the minimum benefit, with 78% of Americans in favor of the idea.
Facing an Uphill Battle
Despite the favorable public reception, Biden’s ambitious Social Security reform plans and overall budget are likely to hit a roadblock in the GOP-controlled U.S. House of Representatives. House Republican leaders have swiftly rejected Biden’s proposed budget, indicating a tough path ahead.
The reality is that any significant changes to bolster Social Security may have to wait for the next administration and a revamped Congress. With the clock ticking until the federal program’s trust funds are depleted, action is imperative to avert across-the-board cuts by 2034.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you’re like most Americans, you’re a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. However, uncovering a few “Social Security secrets” could potentially boost your retirement income by $22,924 annually. By mastering these strategies, you could retire with confidence and peace of mind. Simply click here to delve deeper into these tactics.
View the “Social Security secrets”
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
