Analysts See Potential Gains for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
In a review of ETFs, we analyzed the underlying stocks of the Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (Symbol: EQAL) to determine its potential for growth. The ETF currently has an implied analyst target price of $56.14 per share based on its holdings.
Current Pricing and Predicted Upsides
At a recent trading price of $50.64, EQAL shows a potential upside of 10.86% according to analysts’ average targets. A closer look at the individual stocks reveals some interesting insights: nCino Inc (Symbol: NCNO) has an analyst target of $42.50, suggesting an 18.06% increase from its current price of $36.00. QuantumScape Corp (Symbol: QS) is projected to rise 16.37% from $5.01 to a target of $5.83. SharkNinja Inc (Symbol: SN) shows a possible 15.21% increase, expected to reach $114.55 from its current price of $99.43. The following chart outlines the price performance for these three stocks over the past twelve months:
Summary of Analyst Predictions
Below is a table summarizing the recent prices and 12-month targets for the relevant stocks:
| Name | Symbol | Recent Price | Avg. Analyst 12-Mo. Target | % Upside to Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | EQAL | $50.64 | $56.14 | 10.86% |
| nCino Inc | NCNO | $36.00 | $42.50 | 18.06% |
| QuantumScape Corp | QS | $5.01 | $5.83 | 16.37% |
| SharkNinja Inc | SN | $99.43 | $114.55 | 15.21% |
Considerations for Investors
The question remains: Are analysts’ targets warranted, or could they be overly optimistic? Investors should assess whether the targets reflect recent company and industry developments or if they might be outdated. A high price target can indicate confidence, but it may also lead to downgrades if initial predictions are not met. Therefore, thorough research is essential before making investment decisions.
10 ETFs With Most Upside To Analyst Targets »
Also See:
• AXSM Average Annual Return
• ECLP Videos
• Institutional Holders of LETB
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
