Surge in Options Trading Volume for Carter’s, Element Solutions, and Altair Engineering
Today, Carter’s Inc (Symbol: CRI) experienced notable activity in options trading. A total of 11,515 contracts were traded, representing around 1.2 million underlying shares. This figure is approximately 114.9% of CRI’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which was 1.0 million shares. Particularly active was the $60 strike put option expiring on November 15, 2024, with 5,001 contracts exchanged so far, equivalent to about 500,100 shares. The chart below illustrates CRI’s trading history for the past twelve months, with the $60 strike highlighted in orange:
Element Solutions Inc (Symbol: ESI) saw a similar surge, with 11,511 options contracts traded today, amounting to approximately 1.2 million underlying shares. This volume accounts for about 99.1% of ESI’s average daily trading volume over the previous month, which stood at 1.2 million shares. The $25 strike put option, also expiring on November 15, 2024, generated particularly high interest, with 5,010 contracts traded today, equaling around 501,000 shares. Below, a chart presents ESI’s trading history from the past twelve months, with the $25 strike highlighted in orange:
Meanwhile, Altair Engineering Inc (Symbol: ALTR) tracked options trading volume of 3,149 contracts, translating to around 314,900 underlying shares. This figure represents roughly 97.3% of ALTR’s average daily trading volume over the last month, at 323,790 shares. Today’s most active was the $65 strike call option expiring on October 18, 2024, with 1,505 contracts changing hands, approximately 150,500 shares. The accompanying chart below shows ALTR’s trading history for the past twelve months, highlighted at the $65 strike:
For additional details on the various expirations for CRI, ESI, or ALTR options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
- IYE Dividend History
- INTU Options Chain
- Institutional Holders of BRAQ
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
